*. Oh boy. I really don’t know why we needed six Leprechaun movies (and there would still be a couple more to come, what with the series reboot). And I really really don’t know why we needed two of them set in “Tha Hood” since I didn’t think they had enough material for one. And yet here we are.
*. Actually, and for what it’s worth, this entry was supposed to have the Leprechaun partying with college kids on spring break. But I think shooting another movie in the streets of L.A. was cheaper. So no Leprechaun Gone Wild. At least not yet.
*. I guess the first thing to say here is that this isn’t a sequel to Leprechaun in the Hood, even though that movie ended on a (unique for the series) open note with the Leprechaun still alive. Indeed not only alive but enjoying himself very much as a big-time rap impresario surrounded by fly girls. However, as I’ve had occasion to mention before, there is no consistent narrative being followed in these movies, to the point where it’s unclear if it’s the same leprechaun in each of the films. So we’re starting with a clean slate again here.
*. If the title is a joke it’s one of the few we get. There’s a noticeable swerve away from the lightness of the previous couple of movies. At times they almost seem to be trying to scare us. There are still some comic stretches, like with the Leprechaun’s first appearance at a house party where he gets stuck on a bong, but there are also nastier bits that play more like a traditional slasher horror film. There aren’t even any of the supernaturally grotesque kills that the wee fellow occasionally indulged. The Leprechaun just basically tears people apart with his bare hands. He’s a lot stronger in this movie, and less given to playing tricks.
*. There are carryover gags — like the way the Leprechaun keeps getting an eye torn out in these movies — as well as some new bits of leprechaun mythology. Apparently this leprechaun is an evil leftover of a tribe of earth spirits that were conjured up in medieval days, which is something we haven’t heard before. He is also indestructible except for clover. Religious rituals are of no use because, as the good witch tells them, “This creature predates Christianity.” I don’t think this is true, historically, and even if it was I don’t think it would make theological sense since the Christian God is supposed to be eternal.
*. Maybe I was just feeling burned out myself, but Warwick Davis seems tired of the part here. As well he might have been. Luckily for him this was to be the end of the line.
*. So . . . just as bad as Leprechaun in the Hood but in different ways. If you didn’t like all the jokes in the previous films then this one may appeal to you a bit more. But even though it’s different, it’s still nothing new.
I have lost the will to live
Only two more. You can make it.
No, make it stop, please, I can’t deal with this anymore, it’s too much for anyone to bear….
I’m beginning to think these are fake Leprechauns, and quite a travesty. My leprechauns are cute little fellows who fix my shoes and sometimes go chasing rainbows.
In the first film in the series he does have a fetish for fixing and shining shoes. This is a weakness that can be exploited (when you’re being chased you can toss your shoes at him and he has to pick them up and clean them). There’s also a bit of business with a rainbow. But the later movies drop all this.
The truly fake leprechaun is the creature they come up with in Leprechaun: Origins. That’s not a leprechaun at all.
I am agog that people are maligning the wee fellows. Leprechaun Lives Matter!
You could make the case for being sympathetic to him. Humans really are always trying to steal his gold. But this leprechaun is a pretty nasty bastard too.
Probably set in The Hood (again) because that’s where the audience was?
I’ve only seen Warwick Davis in Willow and that clip you put up a few posts back, and I feel he is not a good actor.
Well, I can’t be too hard on him for what he has to work with here.
I think they just set it in tha hood again because it was cheap.
BTW, you don’t have commenting on your blog but congratulations on your art show. That looks like the quite the venue! Must be hard to have shows these days. Most of the galleries around here are closed.
Thanks, but as we say in movie lingo, “it’s all CGI.” My last real show was in NY, pre-covid.
For this one, I digitally inserted my artwork into an abandoned pumphouse facility AKA River Gallery. It’s a real but essentially “guerrilla” space. I rose to the challenge of competing with the existing graffiti art that adorns the facility. River does plan to have actual shows in the building, at some point.
Wow! That sounds weird, but resourceful! It looks good on the video. I think it would be a neat place to have a real show.
Where did my comment go????
What comment? All your comments should post immediately. I didn’t see anything.
I left a comment on this post earlier but it’s not there, maybe it’s in the spam box.
Found it, as you suggested, in the spam box. Which is weird.
Hmm, well at least I’m found now.